Clearer questions. More informed care.Our research promise

REFERENCE FILE

Dulaglutide

Read the record, then work through the questions.

Reference details

Status as of

Regulatory category
Approved product
Evidence category
Randomized evidence
Mechanism
GLP-1 receptor agonist fusion protein.
Evidence
Randomized studies.
Limitations
No weight-management indication.
Safety
Not recommended for severe gastroparesis.
Formulation and route
Subcutaneous injection.
Approval scope
Trulicity: specified type 2 diabetes populations.

A SECOND LOOK

A question to carry into the reading

Separate the doorway from the people who walked through it when reading about dulaglutide. Draw a line between the entry rules and the description of actual participants. Place each statement on the appropriate side, rather than treating permission to enter as evidence that someone did enter. If a report supplies a participant flow diagram, use it to follow the stages from consideration to inclusion in an analysis. Do not fill an unexplained transition with a guessed reason. Your finished sketch should show which group a result describes and which earlier group would need additional information before being treated as equivalent.

Questions to keep beside the page

  1. Does this sentence describe eligibility rules or people who actually participated?
  2. Which stage of the participant flow supplies the reported result?
  3. What information would explain a difference between the eligible and analyzed groups?

Sources for this file

  1. TRULICITYNLM · Checked

FROM THE REFERENCE DESK

Choose your next reading file.